Sunday, March 19, 2006

 

Stand Up and Cheer

.
John Wilkins, antipodian philosopher of science and Doctor of Punnery, at his blog, Evolving Thoughts, has pointed to Sahotra Sarkar’s account of his recent debate with Paul Nelson of the Discovery Institute at the University of Texas.

This was too funny:

Nelson had two "arguments." The first was that we naturally detect design in artifacts and, therefore, should extend these intuitions to living objects. Let’s concede this line of reasoning and see where it leads. Thanks to our ears (and other organs) we naturally detect motion when we are in moving objects and we equally naturally detect rest. Now, when we sit in our homes (assuming that these are not mobile homes) we use the same ability. We now detect that the Earth is at rest. (This is wonderful -- finally a real scientific discovery from the so-called Discovery Institute.)

But Sakar wasn’t content to rest on those laurels:

The second was a hackneyed version of the old God-of-the-gaps argument. Nelson claimed that there were many biological cases he found difficult to explain using evolutionary theory. I agree but this only suggests that he needs to learn more evolutionary theory.

It would be funnier if more people got the humor.
.
Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

. . . . .

Organizations

Links
How to Support Science Education
archives